One of the most seductive arguments Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) proponents make is the use of phantom limb pain to support their brain-centric neuromatrix model of pain.
According to this view, pain is constructed entirely by the brain, drawing from memories, emotions, and beliefs, and therefore, they argue that even when a limb is missing, the brain can "create" pain.
It’s an alluring idea: if you can feel pain in a limb that no longer exists, then clearly, the pain must be "all in the brain," right?
Wrong.
This oversimplified interpretation leaves out critical aspects of how pain really works.
While it’s true that the brain plays a role in pain perception, phantom limb pain doesn’t necessarily mean that pain is purely a brain-made phenomenon.
In fact, we can better understand phantom limb pain by looking at how referred pain works, which reveals how the brain misinterprets signals coming from other parts of the body.
Let's explore why falling into the trap of the neuromatrix model leads to a skewed understanding of pain—and how the concept of referred pain offers a more grounded explanation.
Referred Pain: A More Balanced Explanation
Phantom limb pain can be better understood through the well-known phenomenon of referred pain.
Referred pain occurs when pain is felt in a different area of the body than the one actually causing the disruption.
A classic example is heart attack pain that is felt in the arm or jaw, despite the issue being in the heart. Here’s how it works:
Disrupted Homeostasis: Referred pain occurs when something disrupts homeostasis in one part of the body (like an organ or muscle) but the brain mistakenly interprets the signals as coming from a different location. For example, muscles can directly refer pain to other areas—trigger points in the shoulder can cause pain in the arm or hand.
Sensory Confusion: The nervous system is complex, and the brain sometimes misinterprets signals, getting the location wrong. Just because you feel pain in your arm during a heart attack doesn’t mean the pain is purely emotional or brain-generated. The pain is still real, even if the brain misreads the location.
In phantom limb pain, this same mechanism could explain why the brain continues to feel pain in a missing limb.
The neural pathways that used to represent that limb are still active, and the brain gets confused by lingering signals from the body or even from nearby muscles and tissues that are still sending sensory input.
Why Phantom Limb Pain Doesn’t Prove Pain is "All in the Brain"
PNE pundits use phantom limb pain as a case to convince you that pain exists entirely in your mind, an argument that can lead to cognitive dissonance.
They try to show you that if the brain can "create" pain where no limb exists, then all pain must be brain-generated.
This is a slippery slope, and while it may sound plausible, it’s not the full picture.
Here’s why:
Misinterpretation of Signals: Just because the brain is involved in the interpretation of pain doesn’t mean pain is purely in the brain. The brain relies on signals from the body—whether they’re coming from an intact limb or the surrounding tissue that used to connect to a now-missing limb. The brain is simply misinterpreting the source of the pain, as it often does with referred pain.
Referred Pain Patterns: Many pain patterns are well-documented and follow predictable referral routes. If we can accept that the brain sometimes gets these signals wrong (as in heart attack pain referred to the arm), we can also accept that the brain might feel pain in a missing limb because it's mistakenly interpreting signals from surrounding tissues or nerves.
Not "All in the Brain": Referred pain proves that even when pain is felt in one area, the root cause lies elsewhere. PNE proponents like to point to brain imaging studies showing activity in the brain during phantom limb pain, but this only shows that the brain is part of the process—it doesn’t mean the brain is the sole cause of pain. The pain is a result of misinterpreted sensory signals, not purely emotional or cognitive constructs.
Don’t Fall for the Trap: The Role of Cognitive Dissonance in PNE
PNE pundits often push the idea that if you accept phantom limb pain as brain-generated, you must accept that all pain is brain-generated.
This tactic creates cognitive dissonance—a psychological state where you hold two contradictory beliefs at once. PNE advocates hope this dissonance will force you to see pain through their lens.
But here’s the problem: just because the brain can misinterpret pain signals doesn’t mean the pain is imaginary or only in the brain.
The PNE model oversimplifies pain by focusing too much on emotions, thoughts, and beliefs, while ignoring the critical role of body-based sensory pathways.
Just like referred pain, phantom limb pain shows that pain is complex and multi-dimensional—it involves both the brain and the body.
Conclusion: A More Comprehensive View of Pain
Phantom limb pain may seem like the perfect example to prove the PNE model, but when we dig deeper, it’s clear that it doesn’t tell the full story.
Like referred pain, phantom limb pain highlights how the brain sometimes misinterprets signals from the body—it doesn’t prove that pain is "all in the brain."
By understanding referred pain patterns and recognizing the importance of sensory input, we can see that the brain is not the sole creator of pain.
Pain is a complex experience that involves miscommunication between body and brain, not just emotional or cognitive constructs.
So next time someone tells you phantom limb pain proves pain is "an output of the brain," remember: the brain might misinterpret the signals, but that doesn’t mean the body isn’t involved.
Let’s not fall for the trap.
Instead, let’s embrace a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of pain, one that recognizes the critical role of sensory pathways in shaping our experience.
References:
Erlenwein J, Diers M, Ernst J, Schulz F, Petzke F. Clinical updates on phantom limb pain. Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 15;6(1):e888. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000888. PMID: 33490849; PMCID: PMC7813551.
Ilfeld BM, Khatibi B, Maheshwari K, Madison SJ, Esa WAS, Mariano ER, Kent ML, Hanling S, Sessler DI, Eisenach JC, Cohen SP, Mascha EJ, Ma C, Padwal JA, Turan A; PAINfRE Investigators. Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks to treat postamputation phantom limb pain: a multicenter, randomized, quadruple-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain. 2021 Mar 1;162(3):938-955. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002087. PMID: 33021563; PMCID: PMC7920494.
Amoruso E, Terhune DB, Kromm M, Kirker S, Muret D, Makin TR. Reassessing referral of touch following peripheral deafferentation: The role of contextual bias. Cortex. 2023 Oct;167:167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.019. Epub 2023 Jul 13. PMID: 37567052; PMCID: PMC11139647
Arendt-Nielsen L, Svensson P. Referred muscle pain: basic and clinical findings. Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):11-9. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200103000-00003. PMID: 11289083.